Commentary on Mastantuono F et al., “Variables associated with the development of hyperoxia in subjects with invasive mechanical ventilation: a retrospective analysis”
References
1. O’Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V, British Thoracic Society Emergency Oxygen Guideline Group, BTS Emergency Oxygen Guideline Development Group. BTS guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. Thorax. 2017;72(Suppl 1):ii1–90.
2. Tyagi S, Brown CA, Dickson RP, Sjoding MW. Outcomes and Predictors of Severe Hyperoxemia in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Single-Center Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022; 19(8):1338–45.
3. Palmer E, Post B, Klapaukh R, Marra G, MacCallum NS, Brealey D, et al. The Association between Supraphysiologic Arterial Oxygen Levels and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 1;200(11):1373–80.
4. Zhu Z, Zhou M, Wei Y, Chen H. Time-varying intensity of oxygen exposure is associated with mortality in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2022 5;26(1):239.
5. Culver BH. Gas Exchange in the Lung. En: Grippi MA, Elias JA, Fishman JA, Kotloff RM, Pack AI, Senior RM. Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders. 5ta ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. p. 97-110.
6. O’Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V. British Thoracic Society Guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017;4(1):e000170.
7. Almeida Filho N. Bases del método epidemiológico. En: Almeida Filho N, Rouquayrol MZ. Introducción a la epidemiología. Buenos Aires: EDUNLa; 2023. p. 109-128.
8. Organización Panamericana de la Salud y Consejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de Ciencias Médicas. Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigación relacionada con la salud con seres humanos. 4ª ed. Ginebra: Consejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de Ciencias Médicas (CIOMS); 2016.
9. Martínez-Ezquerro JD, Riojas-Garza A, Rendón-Macías ME. Significancia clínica sobre significancia estadística. Cómo interpretar los intervalos de confianza a 95 %. Rev Alerg Mex. 2017;64(4):477–86.
10. Westreich D, Greenland S. The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 177(4):292–8.
11. Herbert RD. Research Note: Causal inference. J Physiother. 2020; 66(4):273–7.
12. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alía I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA. 2002; 287(3):345–55.
