Evolution of consciousness in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated in a multisensory stimulation room of a rehabilitation center

Authors

    Nicolás Cardillo 1 , María Cecilia Cragno 2 , Leandro Morelli 3 , Ana Carla Nunes 4 , Daniel Rubén Tornabene 5

    1 Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Psicofísica del Sur
    2 Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Psicofísica del Sur
    3 Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Psicofísica del Sur
    4 Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Psicofísica del Sur
    5 Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Psicofísica del Sur

Abstract

Objective: To describe the evolution of consciousness in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), treated in a multisensory stimulation room (MSSR) of a rehabilitation center, in Argentina.

Materials and method: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted. Patients aged >17 years, admitted to the MSSR at I.Na.Re.P.S between April 2016 and January 2019, with TBI and altered con- sciousness—Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score <21—were included in the study.

Results: Out of 17 patients, thirteen (76.5%) improved at least one category according to the CRS-R. The median time of treatment in the MSSR was 6 (IQR 3.5 - 9) months. The final CRS-R was 15 (IQR 12.5 - 22) points, and the median score change in the pre- and post-treatment CRS-R was 8 (IQR 4 - 12) points. Six (35.3%) patients reached values ≥ 21 points in the CRS-R by the end of their treatment.

Conclusion: Thirteen patients with TBI and altered consciousness improved at least one category after multisensory treatment. Six patients obtained scores ≥ 21 in the CRS-R and were discharged from the MSSR.

References

Adriana Wegner A, Pamela Céspedes F. Traumatismo encefalocraneano en pediatría. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2011;82(3):175–90.

Chico-fernández M, Llompart-pou JA, Guerrero-lópez F, Sánchez-casado M. Epidemiología del trauma grave en España. Med Intesiva. 2016;40(6):327–47.

Giacino JT, Kezmarsky MA, DeLuca J, Cicerone KD. Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72(11):897–901.

Institut Guttmann. Hospital de naurerrehabilitación: Consideraciones respecto a un modelo asistencial planificado, eficiente y de calidad acreditada para la atención especializada de las personas con daño cerebral adquirido. [Internet]. c2003 [cited 2019 June 2]. Available from: http://www.ardacea.es/files/A.-INST-GUTTMAN-Atencion- especializada-DCA.pdf

Lavrijsen JCM, Van Den Bosch JSG, Koopmans RTCM, Van Weel C. Prevalence and characteristics of patients in a vegetative state in Dutch nursing homes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(10):1420–4.

Pisa FE, Biasutti E, Drigo D, Barbone F. The prevalence of vegetative and minimally conscious states. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(4):E23–30.

Saoût V, Ombredane MP, Mouillie JM, Marteau C, Mathé JF, Richard I. Patients in a permanent vegetative state or minimally conscious state in the Maine-et-Loire county of France: A cross-sectional, descriptive study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53(2):96–104.

Fernández-Espejo D. Avances en la evaluación del estado de conciencia: Papel de la evaluación a pie de cama y las técnicas de neuroimagen en el proceso diagnóstico. Papeles del Psicol. 2016;37(1):3–13.

Rodríguez JEM, Elías AR. Escala de coma de Glasgow: origen, análisis y uso apropiado. Enfermería Univ. 2014;11(1):24–35.

Jennett B, Adams JH, Murray LS, Graham DI. Neuropathology in vegetative and severely disabled patients after head injury. Neurology. 2001 Feb;56(4):486–90.

Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Feb;10(2):99–114.

Maksakova O. Teamwork as a way to recovery of consciousness. Vopr Neurochir. 2014;1(June):1–16.

Alberdi Odriozola F, Iriarte Ibarrarán M, Mendía Gorostidi Á, Murgialdai A, Marco Garde P. Pronóstico de las secuelas tras la lesión cerebral. Med Intensiva. 2009;33(4):171–81.

Lombardi FF, Taricco M, De Tanti A, Telaro E, Liberati A. Sensory stimulation for brain injured individuals in coma or vegetative state. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2).

Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale- Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2020–9.

Johnson Rehabilitation Institution: CRS-R Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Administration and Scoring Guidelines [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2019 Mar 20]. Available from: http:// www.tbims.org/combi/crs/CRS Syllabus.pdf

Chuaykarn U, Jitpanya C. Effects of two sensory stimulation models on recovery in adults with severe traumatic brain injury. Int J Med Res Heal Sci. 2017;6(8):69–74.

Einarsen CE, van der Naalt J, Jacobs B, Follestad T, Moen KG, Vik A, et al. Moderate traumatic brain injury: Clinical characteristics and a prognostic model of 12-month outcome. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e1199–210.

Tamashiro M, Rivas ME, Ron M, Salierno F, Dalera M, Olmos L. A Spanish validation of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj. 2014 Dec;28(13–14):1744–7.

Published

2020-02-27

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords

How to Cite

1.
Cardillo N, Cragno MC, Morelli L, Nunes AC, Tornabene DR. Evolution of consciousness in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated in a multisensory stimulation room of a rehabilitation center. AJRPT. 2020;1(2):5-12. doi: 10.58172/ajrpt.v1i2.66