Values of maximal static inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures in healthy Latin American young adults
A systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To assess the values of maximal static inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures in healthy young Latin American adults, as well as the instruments and technical characteristics of measurement.
Materials and methods: Observational studies reporting the values of maximal static inspiratory and/or expiratory mouth pressures (Pimax and/or Pemax) in Latin American young, young adult, adult, and student subjects were included. Articles without full access to content, published over ten years ago, or written in languages other than English, Spanish, or Portuguese were excluded. The search was carried out in Medline/Pubmed, Virtual Health Library, and SciELO databases. Risk of bias analysis was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed. OSF register: https://osf.io/32jqp/
Results: A total of 9 observational studies were included. The age range of subjects was 15 -35. Mean Pimax and/or Pemax values were higher in male subjects. Measurements were made using digital and aneroid manovacuometers, with rigid and diving nozzles, in the supine, sitting, or semi-sitting position.
Conclusion: Most studies on the maximal static mouth pressures of healthy Latin American young adults were conducted on subjects aged between 15 and 35. Higher values of maximal static respiratory pressure were observed in male subjects, and measurements were made in the sitting position, using an analog manovacuometer. Future studies are needed to help implement these findings into actual evidence-based practice.
References
Souza RB. Diretrizes para testes de função pulmonar: Pressões respiratórias estáticas máximas. J Pneumol 2002;28(Supl 3):155-65.
Dutra Pereira F, Zaidan de Barros P, Bezerra da Silva E. Pressões inspiratória e expiratória máximas: confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures: intra- and inter-rater reliability. Fisioterapia Brasil 2019;20(6):744-751. doi: 10.33233/fb.v20i6.2969
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Mora-Romero UDJ, Gochicoa-Rangel L, Guerrero-Zúñiga S, Cid-Juárez S, Silva-Cerón M, Salas-Escamilla I. Presiones inspiratoria y espiratoria máximas: Recomendaciones y procedimiento. Neumol. cir. torax 2014;73(4):247-253. doi: 10.35366/55380
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Neder JA, Andreoni S, Lerario MC, Nery LE. Reference values for lung function tests. II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999 Jun;32(6):719-27. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X1999000600007
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Black LF, Hyatt RE. Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship tage and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 May;99(5):696-702.
Harik-Khan RI, Wise RA, Fozard JL. Determinants of maximal inspiratory pressure. The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;158(5 Pt 1):1459-64. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9712006
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Evans JA, Whitelaw WA. The assessment of maximal respiratory mouth pressures in adults. Respir Care. 2009 Oct;54(10):1348-59.
Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1202-18. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1202
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Costa LO, Maher CG, Lopes AD, de Noronha MA, Costa LC. Transparent reporting of studies relevant to physical therapy practice. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Aug-Sep;15(4):267-71. English, Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552011005000009
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Roma, Italia: El riego en América del Sur, Centroamérica y Caribe en cifras. Encuesta AQUASTAT. [Internet]. 2016 [citado el 18 de Noviembre de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/3/CA3580ES/ca3580es.pdf
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;25(9):603-5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Bunn PDS, Bezerra da Silva E. Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review. Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(3):352-61. doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/17004225032018
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Ribeiro A, Mateus-Vasconcelos E, Silva T, Brito L, Oliveira H. Functional assessment of the pelvic floor muscles by electromyography: is there a normalization in data analysis? A systematic review. Fisioter Pesqui 2018:25(1):88-99. doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/16559525012018
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Hernández-Álvarez ED, Rodríguez-Medina CL; Guzmán-David CA; Ortiz-González DC; Rico-Barrera AV. Effect of a respiratory muscle training program on lung function, respiratory muscle strength and resting oxygen consumption in sedentary young people. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina 2016,64(1): 47-52.
Onaga FI, Jamami M, Ruas G, Di Lorenzo VAP, Jamami LK. Influência de diferentes tipos de bocais e diâmetros de traqueias na manovacuometria. Fisioter. mov.2016;23(2):211-219. doi: 10.1590/S0103-51502010000200005
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Coelho CM, Carvalho RM, Gouvêa SA, Novo Júnior JM. Comparisons among parameters of maximal respiratory pressures in healthy subjects. J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38(5):605-613. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132012000500010
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Pereira NH, Fernandes PM, Santos RNLC, Carvalho CP, GP, Soares MESM, Santos ACBC. Comparação dos valores obtidos e previstos das pressões respiratórias máximas em adultos jovens. Cienc Cuid Saude 2015;14(1):955-961 doi: 10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v14i1.18736
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Santos R, Pessoa B, dos Reis I, Gonçalves Labadessa I, Jamami M. Manovacuometry performed by different length tracheas. Manovacuometria realizada por meio de traquéias de diferentes comprimentos. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa. 2017;24:9-14 doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/15614124012017
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Nagato AC, Nunes LAS, Dourado VA, Diniz MF, Silva MAS, Dornelas G, Bezerra FS. Correlation between maximal expiratory pressure (mpe) and maximal expiratory flow peak (mefp) in healthy individuals. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Experimentales - Animales y Humanos. 2012;4(único):7-15.
Rodríguez-Medina CL, Hernández-Álvarez ED, Guzmán-David CA, Ortiz-González DC, Rico-Barrera AV. Caracterización de las medidas de presión inspiratoria y espiratoria máxima en adultos jóvenes sanos de Bogotá, D.C. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina. 2016;64(1):53-58. doi: 10.15446/revfacmed.v64n1.47089
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Adaos LC, González BA, Slater MD, Medina GP, Muñoz CR, Escobar CM. Análisis de presión inspiratoria máxima según tres protocolos en estudiantes voluntarios asintomáticos de la Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile. Revista Chilena De Enfermedades Respiratorias. 2017;33(1):21–30. doi: 10.4067/S0717-73482017000100004
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Costa R, Almeida N, Ribeiro F. Body position influences the maximum inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures of young healthy subjects. Physiotherapy. 2015 Jun;101(2):239-41. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.08.002
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Serie de informes Técnicos No 731. [Internet]. 2014 [citado el 11 de Noviembre de 2022]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/36922/WHO_TRS_731_spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Cardoso DM, Paiva DN, Albuquerque IM, Jost T, Paixão AV. Effects of expiratory positive airway pressure on the electromyographic activity of accessory inspiratory muscles in COPD patients. J Bras Pneumol. 2011;37(1):46-53. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132011000100008
Crossref
| Google Scholar
Herrera de la Rosa A, García Río F. Exploración funcional de los músculos respiratorios. Arch Bronconeumol. 2000. Mar;36(3):146-58. doi: 10.1016/S0300-2896(15)30200-3
Crossref
| Google Scholar
López Jové OR, Arce SC, Chávez RW, Alaniz A, Lancellotti D, Chiapella MN, Julián A, De Vito EL, Sala HL; GEFRA group. Spirometry reference values for an andean high-altitude population. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Jan;247:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.09.016
Crossref
| Google Scholar
