Adaptación transcultural y validación de contenido de un cuestionario para explorar las perspectivas de fisioterapeutas de Argentina con respecto al uso de factores contextuales en el dolor musculoesquelético

Mauro Federico Andreu; Pablo Policastro; Sergio Adrián Terrasa; Giacomo Rossettini; Marco Testa; Tatiana Dias de Carvalho; Yolanda Pardo

doi:10.58172/ajrpt.v4i2.227

Autores/as

Mauro Federico Andreu Universidad Nacional De La Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-3683
Pablo Policastro KINÉ, Kinesiología Deportiva y Funcional. CABA, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0434-2844
Sergio Adrián Terrasa Departamento de Investigación, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-0709
Giacomo Rossettini Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto 2, 17100, Savona, SV, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-7681
Marco Testa Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto 2, 17100, Savona, SV, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8643-7200
Tatiana Dias de Carvalho Universidad Nacional De La Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5114-2573
Yolanda Pardo CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58172/ajrpt.v4i2.227

Palabras clave:

factores contextuales, dolor musculoesquelético, encuestas y cuestionarios, fisioterapia, traducciones, estudio de validación

Resumen

Objetivo: Describir los procesos de adaptación transcultural al español argentino y validación de contenido de la versión italiana de un cuestionario para explorar los conocimientos, creencias y actitudes de los fisioterapeutas de Argentina con respecto al uso de factores contextuales en el dolor musculoesquelético.

Materiales y método: El diseño de este estudio es un modelo mixto que incluye métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos dividido en tres etapas: adaptación transcultural, validez de contenido y prueba piloto. Para la validez de contenido, se aplicó el método Delphi modificado de dos rondas y se calcularon el índice de validez de contenido (IVC), la razón de validez de contenido (RVC) y el índice kappa modificado. Se realizó una prueba piloto para determinar la factibilidad y validez de contenido de la versión final.

Resultados: Este estudio incluyó 30 fisioterapeutas. Luego de aplicar los lineamientos recomendados para la traducción y adaptación transcultural, la nueva versión conservó las principales dimensiones de la versión original. La evaluación de la validez de contenido, realizada por un panel de expertos y mediante entrevistas cognitivas, determinó que los ítems incluidos en la versión resultante eran claros, relevantes y suficientes para el contexto argentino. De acuerdo con los resultados del análisis cuantitativo de la validez de contenido, las estimaciones del IVC, RVC y kappa alcanzaron valores iguales a 1,0.

Conclusión: Utilizando un enfoque sistemático e iterativo, se obtuvo la adaptación transcultural y validez de contenido del cuestionario en términos de claridad, relevancia y suficiencia, lo que permite evaluar a futuro sus propiedades psicométricas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

da Silva TM, Costa L da CM, Garcia AN, Costa LOP. What do physical therapists think about evidence-based practice? A systematic review. Man Ther. 2015;20(3):388-401.

Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):27.

Kamper SJ. Engaging With Research: Linking Evidence With Practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(6):512-513.

Benedetti F. Placebo and the new physiology of the doctor-patient relationship. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(3):1207-1246.

Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016;24:65-74.

Geri T, Viceconti A, Minacci M, Testa M, Rossettini G. Manual therapy: Exploiting the role of human touch. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;44:102044.

Palese A, Rossettini G, Colloca L, Testa M. The impact of contextual factors on nursing outcomes and the role of placebo/nocebo effects: a discussion paper. Pain Rep. 2019;4(3).

Rossettini G, Latini TM, Palese A, Jack SM, Ristori D, Gonzatto S, Testa M. Determinants of patient satisfaction in outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a systematic, qualitative meta-summary, and meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(4):460-472.

Bonfim IDS, Corrêa LA, Nogueira LAC, Meziat-Filho N, Reis FJJ, de Almeida RS. 'Your spine is so worn out' - the influence of clinical diagnosis on beliefs in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain - a qualitative study'. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):811-818.

Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet Lond Engl. 2001;357(9258):757-762.

Carlino E, Frisaldi E, Benedetti F. Pain and the context. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(6):348-355.

Wager TD, Atlas LY. The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(7):403-418.

Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Cleland JA. Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. Phys Ther. 2010;90(9):1345-1355.

Bialosky JE, George SZ, Bishop MD. How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(6):293-295.

Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009;14(5):531-538.

Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Coronado RA, Penza CW, Simon CB, George SZ. Unraveling the Mechanisms of Manual Therapy: Modeling an Approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;48(1):8-18.

Newell D, Lothe LR, Raven TJL. Contextually Aided Recovery (CARe): a scientific theory for innate healing. Chiropr Man Ther. 2017;25:6.

Rossettini G, Palese A, Geri T, Mirandola M, Tortella F, Testa M. The Knowledge of Contextual Factors as Triggers of Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain: Findings From a National Survey. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 4;10:478.

Oliveira VC, Refshauge KM, Ferreira ML, Pinto RZ, Beckenkamp PR, Negrao Filho RF, Ferreira PH. Communication that values patient autonomy is associated with satisfaction with care: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2012;58(4):215-29.

Pinto RZ, Ferreira ML, Oliveira VC, Franco MR, Adams R, Maher CG, Ferreira PH. Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2012;58(2):77-87.

O'Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, Leahy I, Bunzli S, O'Sullivan PB, O'Sullivan K. What Influences Patient-Therapist Interactions in Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy? Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):609-22.

Hush JM, Cameron K, Mackey M. Patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal physical therapy care: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2011;91(1):25-36.

Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, van Tulder MW. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 2;(9):CD000963.

Andreu M, Policastro PO. ¿Por qué son importantes los factores contextuales en el abordaje kinésico? AJRPT. 2020;2(3):1-3.

Fernandez J, Lunkes LC, Meziat-Filho N. Biopsychosocial approaches to telerehabilitation for chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A real possibility for physical therapists, that is here to stay. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022 Jan-Feb;26(1):100350.

Rossettini G, Palese A, Geri T, Fiorio M, Colloca L, Testa M. Physical therapists’ perspectives on using contextual factors in clinical practice: Findings from an Italian national survey. PloS One. 2018;13(11):e0208159.

Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104.

Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157.

Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170.

World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. [Accedido el 23 de mayo de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/

Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design [Libro en internet]. Sage Publications Inc: 2004. [Accedido el 23 de mayo de 2021]. Disponible en: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/cognitive-interviewing/book225856

Conrad FG, Blair J. Data Quality in Cognitive Interviews: The Case of Verbal Reports. In: Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New York: John Wiley & Sons;2004:67-87.

Bibiloni N, Torre AC, Angles MV, Terrasa SA, Vazquez Peña FR, Sommer J, et al. Validación de un cuestionario en español sobre la usabilidad de la telemedicina. Medicina (Buenos Aires). 2020;80(6):649-653.

Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage. 2004;42(1):15-29.

Galicia Alarcón LA, Balderrama Trápaga JA, Edel Navarro R, Galicia Alarcón LA, Balderrama Trápaga JA, Edel Navarro R. Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos: propuesta de una herramienta virtual. Apert Guadalaj Jal. 2017;9(2):42-53.

Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(2):165-178.

Safikhani S, Sundaram M, Bao Y, Mulani P, Revicki DA. Qualitative assessment of the content validity of the Dermatology Life Quality Index in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. J Dermatol Treat. 2013;24(1):50-59.

Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-467.

Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-385.

Schilling LS, Dixon JK, Knafl KA, Grey M, Ives B, Lynn MR. Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nurs Res. 2007;56(5):361-366.

Lawshe CH. A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-575.

Rodrigues IB, Adachi JD, Beattie KA, MacDermid JC. Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):540.

Converse L, Barrett K, Rich E, Reschovsky J. Methods of Observing Variations in Physicians’ Decisions: The Opportunities of Clinical Vignettes. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30 Suppl 3:S586-594.

Veloski J, Tai S, Evans AS, Nash DB. Clinical vignette-based surveys: a tool for assessing physician practice variation. Am J Med Qual Off J Am Coll Med Qual. 2005;20(3):151-157.

Leeuw ED de, Hox J, Dillman D, editores. International Handbook of Survey Methodology. Alemania: The European Association of Methodology; 2008. p.549.

Schmidt WC. World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1997;29(2):274-279.

Shapiro AK, Morris L. The placebo effect in medical and psychological therapies. In: Garfield S, Bergin A, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour changes. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978:369-410.

Hróbjartsson A. What are the main methodological problems in the estimation of placebo effects? J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(5):430-435.

Steurer J. The Delphi method: an efficient procedure to generate knowledge. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(8):959-961.

Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:37.

Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research. J Constr Eng Manag. 2010;136(1):99-107.

Carlino E, Benedetti F. Different contexts, different pains, different experiences. Neuroscience. 2016;338:19-26.

Wiech K, Ploner M, Tracey I. Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12(8):306-313.

Bushnell MC, Ceko M, Low LA. Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(7):502-511.

Linde K, Fässler M, Meissner K. Placebo interventions, placebo effects and clinical practice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1572):1905-1912.

Rossettini G, Testa M. Manual therapy RCTs: should we control placebo in placebo control? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(3):500-501.

Rossettini G, Camerone EM, Carlino E, Benedetti F, Testa M. Context matters: the psychoneurobiological determinants of placebo, nocebo and context-related effects in physiotherapy. Arch Physiother. 2020;10:11.

Schedlowski M, Enck P, Rief W, Bingel U. Neuro-Bio-Behavioral Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Responses: Implications for Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice. Pharmacol Rev. 2015;67(3):697-730.

Durning SJ, Artino AR, Pangaro LN, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. Perspective: redefining context in the clinical encounter: implications for research and training in medical education. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2010;85(5):894-901.